RESEARCH PAPER
Theoretical reconstruction of the environmental Kuznets curve
Lech Gruszecki 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Katedra Zastosowań Matematyki, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
2
Katedra Ekonomii Międzynarodowej, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Bartosz Jóźwik   

Katedra Ekonomii Międzynarodowej, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950, Lublin, Polska
Publish date: 2019-09-30
Submission date: 2019-02-07
Final revision date: 2019-07-05
Acceptance date: 2019-07-10
 
Gospodarka Narodowa 2019;299(3):95–117
KEYWORDS
JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
ABSTRACT
The aim of the article is to review the economic environmental models of the Kuznets curve, which take into account constitutive phenomena of the contemporary economy. Reviewing the models, we answer the question how the change in the level of economic development, measured by the value of GDP per capita, may affect the degradation or improvement of the quality of the environment, and what other factors – related ndirectly to the level of economic development – can have a significant impact on the discussed relationship. Combination of various models is an attempt to multi-dimensional characterization of this problem, which allows defining a broader scope of research on this relationship and can contribute to a better understanding of its structural aspects. As a result of our study we state that relevant to verification of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis are precise characteristics of the environmental degradation process on the one hand, that is the distinction between the pollution stock and flow, and on the other hand – the exact characteristics of several factors related to income (GDP per capita): income elasticity of demand for environmental quality; social inequalities; population growth; as well as trade liberalization.
 
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Allard A., Takman J., Uddin G. S., Ahmed A. [2018], The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 6: 5848–5861.
 
2.
Alvarez-Herranz A., Balsalobre-Lorente D. [2015], Energy Regulation in the EKC Model with a Dampening Effect, J Environ Anall Chem, vol. 2, no. 3: 1–10.
 
3.
Amri F. [2018], Carbon dioxide emissions, total factor productivity, ICT, trade, financial development, and energy consumption: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Tunisia, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 33: 33691–33701.
 
4.
Andreoni J., Levinson A. [2001], The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 80: 269–286.
 
5.
Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., Filis, G. [2017], Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth. An ethical dilemma, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, no. 68 (Part 1): 808–824.
 
6.
Beltratti A. [1996], Models of economic growth with environmental assets, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
 
7.
Borghesi S. [2000], Inequality, Growth and the Environment: A Steady-State Analysis of the Kuznets Curve and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, SSRN Electronic Journal, no. 290: 1–29.
 
8.
Boyce J. K. [1994], Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation, Ecological Economics, vol. 11, no. 3: 169–178.
 
9.
Boyce J. K. [2008], Is inequality bad for the environment? w: R. C. Wilkinson, W. R. Freudenburg (red.), Equity and the Environment, Elsevier, London: 267–288.
 
10.
Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K., Smyth, R. [2018], The Environmental Kuznets Curve in the OECD: 1870–2014, Energy Economics, 75 (C): 389–399.
 
11.
Copeland B. R., Taylor M. S. [2004], Trade, Growth, and the Environment, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 42, no. 1: 7–71.
 
12.
Dinda S. [2006], Globalization and Environment: Can Pollution Haven Hypothesis alone explain the impact of Globalization on Environment? Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
 
13.
Grossman G. M., Krueger A. B. [1991], Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 39.
 
14.
Heidari, H., Katircioglu, S. T., Saeidpour, L. [2015], Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, no. 64: 785–791.
 
15.
Heil, M. T., Selden, T. M. [2001], Carbon emissions and economic development: future trajectories based on historical experience, Environment and Development Economics, no. 6: 63–83.
 
16.
Kaika D., Zervas E. [2013], The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory. Part A Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case, Energy Policy, vol. 62: 1392–1402.
 
17.
Kaika D., Zervas E. [2013], The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B Critical issues, Energy Policy, vol. 62: 1403–1411.
 
18.
Kais, S., Sami, H. [2016], An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions. Panel data evidence from fifty eight countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, no. 59 (C): 1101–1110.
 
19.
Kasuga H., Takaya M. [2017], Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities, Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 142: 3689–3701.
 
20.
Khanna N., Plassmann F. [2004], The demand for environmental quality and the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis, Ecological Economics, vol. 51, no. 3–4: 225–236.
 
21.
Kuznets S. [1955], Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review, vol. 45, no. 1: 1–28.
 
22.
Kuznets S. [1963], Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: VIII. Distribution of Income by Size, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 11, no. 2: 1–80.
 
23.
Kyophilavong P., Shahbaz M., Anwar S., Masood S. [2015], The energy-growth nexus in Thailand: Does trade openness boost up energy consumption? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 46: 265–274.
 
24.
Lau L.‑S., Choong C.‑K., Ng C.‑F., Liew F.‑M., Ching S.‑L. [2018], Is nuclear energy clean? Revisit of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in OECD countries, Economic Modelling, no. 77: 12–20.
 
25.
Lieb C. M. [2004], The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Flow versus Stock Pollution: The Neglect of Future Damages, Environmental Resource Economics, vol. 29: 483–506.
 
26.
Liu Q., Wang S., Zhang W., Li J., Kong Y. [2018], Examining the effects of income inequality on CO2 emissions Evidence from non-spatial and spatial perspectives, Applied Energy, vol. 236: 163–171.
 
27.
Lopez R. [1994], The Environment as a Factor of Production: The Effects of Economic Growth and Trade Liberalization, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 27: 163–184.
 
28.
Magnani E. [2000], The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution, Ecological Economics, vol. 32: 431–443.
 
29.
Martinez-Zarzoso I., Vidovic M., Voicu A. M. [2017], Are the Central East European Countries Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment Development, vol. 26, no. 1: 25–50.
 
30.
McConnell K. E. [1997], Income and the demand for environmental quality, Environment and Development Economics, vol. 2, no. 2: 383–399.
 
31.
Özokcu S., Özdemir Ö. [2017], Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 72: 639–647.
 
32.
Pablo-Romero P. M., Sánchez-Braza, A. [2017], Residential energy environmental Kuznets curve in the EU-28, Energy, vol. 125: 44–54.
 
33.
Padhan H., Haouas I., Sahoo B., Heshmati A. [2018], What Matters for Environmental Quality in the Next-11 Countries: Economic Growth or Income Inequality? Discussion Paper Series IZA: 1–26.
 
34.
Panayotou T. [1993], Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development, Working Paper No. 992927783402676, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
 
35.
Roca, J., Padilla, E., Farre, M., Galletto, V. [2001], Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, Ecological Economics, no. 39: 85–99.
 
36.
Saidi K., Ben Mbarek M. [2017], The impact of income, trade, urbanization, and financial development on CO2 emissions in 19 emerging economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 14: 12 748–12 757.
 
37.
Sarkodie, S. A. [2018], The invisible hand and EKC hypothesis: what are the drivers of environmental degradation and pollution in Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, no. 25: 21 993–22 022.
 
38.
Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. [1992], Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence, World Bank Publications, vol. 904.
 
39.
Shahbaz M., Nasreen S., Ling C. H., Sbia R. [2014], Causality between trade openness and energy consumption: What causes what in high, middle and low income countries, Energy Policy, vol. 70: 126–143.
 
40.
Shahbaz M., Sinha A. [2018], Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emission: A Literature Survey, Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
 
41.
Stern D. I. [2004], The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve, World Development, vol. 32, no. 8: 1419–1439.
 
42.
Stern, D. I., Common, M. S. [2001], Is There and Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur? Journal of Economics and Management, no. 41: 162–178.
 
43.
Torras M., Boyce J. K. [1998], Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics, vol. 25: 147–160.
 
44.
Ulucak, R., Bilgili, F. [2018], A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 188: 144–157.
 
45.
Wang S. X., Fu Y. B., Zhang Z. G. [2015], Population growth and the environmental Kuznets curve, China Economic Review, vol. 36: 146–165.
 
46.
Zaman, K., Moemen, M. A.‑E. [2017], Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development. Evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, no. 74: 1119–1130.
 
eISSN:2300-5238
ISSN:0867-0005